Friends of St. Laurentius Church release report detailing how to save church

Today we are releasing our 200 page recourse document which was received by the Vatican.

The contractor and engineer for the parishioners interested in saving St. Laurentius Church gave an initial estimate cost of $650,000 for all repairs needed for the church.  The Phase I repair cost is estimated between $150,000 and $200,000 for the immediate repairs required by the Violation Notice of the City of Philadelphia.  Phase II repair costs estimated between $450,000 and $500,000 could be collected over a  period of 10 or more years allowing for planned giving to repair the rest of the church as our finance plan describes.

The $3.5 million estimate from the Archdiocese assumes that the towers are in need of repair.

Facts:

1. On March 26, 2014 a meeting was held with representatives of Holy Name of Jesus Parish, the Archdiocese, and the City of Philadelphia.  It was asked several times, “Was St. Laurentius Church in imminent danger of collapse?”.  Repeatedly, the answer was “NO”.

2. No one who represented the Archdiocese had physically inspected the inside of the church, specifically the towers.  The engineering firm hired by the Archdiocese only looked at the towers from the ground level outside the church.  They made their assessment of the towers without a full inspection.

3. No comprehensive survey was done at that time, nor has it been done to determine the location and extent of the types of masonry defects

4. This same engineering firm never brought a contractor through the church for pricing the possible options for the building.  The costs presented in their report were only estimates based on little if any information.

5.  The Archdiocese had not contacted any contractors for other proposals, which is the usual norm

6. O’Donnell Naccarato claimed the top of the tower was apporiximately  6″ off vertical.  What the engineers failed to realize was the method of construction done in the mid 1800’s.  The builders used optical illusion to make towers look higher.  They narrowed the circumference of the turret as they went higher.  It is this architectural illlusion that the engineers incorrectly identified as a dangerous leaning of the towers of St. Laurentius Church.

7. When questioned, O’Donnell Naccarato admitted they had not done an internal or external inspection of the towers of the church.  As a result added costs now made their proposals extremely expensive.

8. St. Laurentius convent recently sold for around $350,000. The convent was built using donations from St. Laurentius parishioners.  The Archdiocese stated that the funds from this sale could not be used to repair the church, but could only be used towards demolition.

9. Holy Name’s convent is currently under agreement with Aquinas Realty group. This agreement was signed a day before Holy Name Parish merged with St. Laurentius Parish.  The convent was never put on the market publicly, and Aquinas is buying the property for way under market value.  The agreement was extended by 18 months and expires on June 10th.  Holy Name has been paying to maintain this property for 2 years while it is under agreement.  The agreement stipulates that Aquinas can decide whether or not to purchase the property until the agreement expires.  If they decide not to buy, all escrow funds are returned to them.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Friends of St. Laurentius Church release report detailing how to save church”

  1. Ok, then it only will cost $650,000 to repair St. Laurentius. With the sale of the Convent for $300,000 plus donations. Do we have the $650,000 needed to repair our Church? Why won’t they consider repairing St. Laurnetius??? I know HN is jealous!! Oh, I pray to God that St. Laurentius Church WILL NOT BE DEMOLISHED!!!!!
    Thanks for the email
    God bless St. Laurentius!!!!

    1. i feel really bad for all parishioners of St Laurentius it is a sad day for them but please get real ! HN jealous whats wrong with you?

  2. If this church can be saved it will be a great thing for the archdiocese and for the archbishop. His reliance on unreliable employees brings all his leadershio into disrepute. This is an argument about facts. It sure seems to me that you are factually correct and the archdicesan employees are factually incorrect.

    Thanks for all your work. I’m praying for you. I’m sure many others are too.

  3. It seems like the Archdiocese isn’t interested at all in repairing the church, they want to demo the building so they can sell the land. There’s no profit in it if the church stays open. I wonder if the church can be protected as a historic site?

    1. I think Theo has a point, though how this affects the decision-making seems impossible to demonstrate. Individual employees of the archdiocese have relationships with contractors and make decisions that mean a great deal to those contractors.

  4. I am a project manager for a larger consultating firm also a certified engineer technician if I can help at one of your meetings to give you the insite on the construction industry please feel free to call or email

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s